AI Gateway: a resilient reactive layer for multi-provider LLM traffic
How I turned fragmented model integrations into a unified, fault-tolerant gateway.
- Reactive Spring WebFlux gateway routing OpenAI / Gemini / Anthropic / DashScope traffic
- Resilience4j circuit breaker, bulkhead, and retry for graceful degradation
- Per-request token-usage tracking under one OpenAI-compatible API contract
- Problem
- Teams needed one stable API across multiple LLM providers, but each had different request/response semantics, rate limits, and failure patterns.
- Architecture
- A Java Spring WebFlux gateway handles routing, resilience, and policy control; a Python FastAPI worker serves local models and embedding tasks behind it.
- Trade-offs
- Chose reliability and observability over minimal complexity — more moving parts, but consistent behavior when a provider degrades or rate-limits.
- Result
- A reusable gateway baseline for future AI products that reduces integration overhead and standardizes production controls.
- What I'd improve next
- Per-provider latency dashboards, token-cost analytics, and automated fallback tuning driven by live traffic signals.






